dan u
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
andy ridgeway wrote:i get off on proxy outrage as much as the next man, i just like to feel it’s well founded, rather than just Murdoch pressing my buttons, getme.
yes i do.
just had this same argument with someone else on another forum saying ‘it’s just sensationalist tabloid reporting’
well yes they do, obviously.
but sometimes someone is actually just a bit of a wrongun.
/dons anti nonce balaclava and goes a burnin..
andy ridgeway wrote:i get off on proxy outrage as much as the next man, i just like to feel it’s well founded, rather than just Murdoch pressing my buttons, getme.yes i do.
just had this same argument with someone else on another forum saying ‘it’s just sensationalist tabloid reporting’
well yes they do, obviously.
but sometimes someone is actually just a bit of a wrongun.
/dons anti nonce balaclava and goes a burnin..
andy ridgeway wrote:do you have a link to confirm what you say about langham being a level five virtuapaed?we are at paedcon five, this is not a drill?
“During the three-week trial the court heard that detectives had raided Langham’s home in Golford, Kent, in November 2005 after a tip-off that his credit card had been used to access child pornography websites. They had removed three computers and police experts found a series of graphic images including some rated level 5 by child protection officers.Last night Ken Gross, the crown prosecution’s solicitor in the case, said the most serious clips included “sadism and penetrative sex between children and adults”. “These were not ‘child pornography’ images, they were very serious child abuse images and anyone who downloads this sort of thing is responsible for the suffering of real children.“”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2140721,00.html
bit in bold is the important bit imo.
andy ridgeway wrote:do you have a link to confirm what you say about langham being a level five virtuapaed?we are at paedcon five, this is not a drill?
“During the three-week trial the court heard that detectives had raided Langham’s home in Golford, Kent, in November 2005 after a tip-off that his credit card had been used to access child pornography websites. They had removed three computers and police experts found a series of graphic images including some rated level 5 by child protection officers.Last night Ken Gross, the crown prosecution’s solicitor in the case, said the most serious clips included “sadism and penetrative sex between children and adults”. “These were not ‘child pornography’ images, they were very serious child abuse images and anyone who downloads this sort of thing is responsible for the suffering of real children.“”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2140721,00.html
bit in bold is the important bit imo.
andy ridgeway wrote:like “lolita porn” featuring 20 year old fully grown women, who happen to have small tits.i’m not saying that he isn’t a full on nonceo, just that we haven’t seen any actual evidence of it…
😀
do you think they should post the vids on youtube to let us all decide!
maybe run an online poll?
‘would it be noncing to wank off over this bird’
andy ridgeway wrote:like “lolita porn” featuring 20 year old fully grown women, who happen to have small tits.i’m not saying that he isn’t a full on nonceo, just that we haven’t seen any actual evidence of it…
😀
do you think they should post the vids on youtube to let us all decide!
maybe run an online poll?
‘would it be noncing to wank off over this bird’
andy ridgeway wrote:“13-year-old preteen underage”what the fuck does that mean?
fuck knows. it’s contradictory!
unless it was some kind of search tag/label?
andy ridgeway wrote:“13-year-old preteen underage”what the fuck does that mean?
fuck knows. it’s contradictory!
unless it was some kind of search tag/label?
andy ridgeway wrote:but i do maintain that in these kind of cases, when the country is gripped by noncesteria and we’re clearly expected to form a moral judgement on the man, that all parties concerned deserve a more nuanced assesment.it’s weird to me that there are shades of murder (manslaughter etc), but not of sex.
that is why there is a gap between judgment and sentencing is it not?
to allow the ‘hysteria’ and emotions to subside in the court room if nothing else, for proffessionals to give reports, psych assessments etc to allow the judge to sentence according to guidelines and previous cases
i suspect the sentence given to a man caught looking at 15 year old girls and a man looking at 5 year old girls would be materially different in terms of sentence – if not in the eyes of The Sun (turn to page 3 for 16 year old Sophie in her school uniform!)
andy ridgeway wrote:but i do maintain that in these kind of cases, when the country is gripped by noncesteria and we’re clearly expected to form a moral judgement on the man, that all parties concerned deserve a more nuanced assesment.it’s weird to me that there are shades of murder (manslaughter etc), but not of sex.
that is why there is a gap between judgment and sentencing is it not?
to allow the ‘hysteria’ and emotions to subside in the court room if nothing else, for proffessionals to give reports, psych assessments etc to allow the judge to sentence according to guidelines and previous cases
i suspect the sentence given to a man caught looking at 15 year old girls and a man looking at 5 year old girls would be materially different in terms of sentence – if not in the eyes of The Sun (turn to page 3 for 16 year old Sophie in her school uniform!)
from bbc
“When it was put to him that 99.9% of the images he viewed contained pre-teen girls, Mr Langham said: “Little girls are not my prominent interest sexually. Little girls are not my interest at all.”
He admitted he had subscribed to an American website that featured women being raped but said violence against women did not arouse him.
“I’m fascinated by what people do and I’m fascinated by people tying each other up and doing weird sexual things to each other; I think it’s interesting.” “
from bbc
“When it was put to him that 99.9% of the images he viewed contained pre-teen girls, Mr Langham said: “Little girls are not my prominent interest sexually. Little girls are not my interest at all.”
He admitted he had subscribed to an American website that featured women being raped but said violence against women did not arouse him.
“I’m fascinated by what people do and I’m fascinated by people tying each other up and doing weird sexual things to each other; I think it’s interesting.” “
he had pictures and video’s of noncing.
some of it was pretty young i read before, but it doesnt say that on here –
he had pictures and video’s of noncing.
some of it was pretty young i read before, but it doesnt say that on here –
no problemo pirate.. i’ll let andy know his arse is safe.
keep you in the loop on any future missions if you want mate 🙂
